RENAFAN
49 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
22.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 2
29.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 3
10.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 4
22.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 5
21.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 6
22.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 7
03.11.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 8
18.05.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 9
15.10.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 10
03.10.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 11
27.01.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 12
22.12.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 13
22.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 14
17.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 15
05.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 16
11.12.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. High payments. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Berlin 17
10.09.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Buch 18
01.06.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Hamburg 19
30.05.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Hannover 20
04.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Isernhagen 21
16.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Isernhagen 22
26.09.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Isernhagen 23
16.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 24
06.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 25
16.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 26
25.04.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 27
13.12.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 28
21.04.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 29
21.12.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 30
19.01.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 31
01.05.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 32
03.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 33
04.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 34
10.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 35
04.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 36
16.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Germany 37
03.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Excellent activity. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 38
10.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Germany 39
04.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 40
01.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Leinfelden 41
06.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Magdeburg 42
09.09.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Mörnsheim 43
14.10.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 44
09.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 45
03.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 46
22.11.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Rostock 47
23.06.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Rostock 48
23.06.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Ulm 49
21.07.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
